Posts Tagged ‘talks’

What bike culture do we want? – Sydney event

Tuesday, November 16th, 2010

Interesting event coming up in Sydney.

BIKESydney BrainsTrust in conjunction with the Bicycle Film Festival are asking “What bike culture do we want?”

New York Bike Snob says it doesn’t exist.
Copenhagen says it shouldn’t exist.
Portland says life’s not worth living without it…

Join Jonathan Daly (GHD consulting), Elizabeth Cage (University of Sydney) and Josh Capelin (Producer, BFF) in an engaging conservation about the role of bike culture in Sydney now, and in the years ahead.

What bike culture do we want?

Hosted by the Bicycle Film Festival and BIKESydney
Venue kindly provided by our friends at Digital Eskimo.

Tuesday, November 16, 2010 from 7:00 PM – 9:00 PM

Bike Politics workshop – write up

Monday, October 4th, 2010

There is a terrific overview of the Bike Politics Conference on Dave Horton’s cycling blog – Thinking about cycling . The event was hosted by the Centre for Mobilities Research at Lancaster University.

Cycling and Society Symposium

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

6th September 2010
University of Oxford
Katrina Jungnickel

Abstract:

“Nattering” and “silly little things”: Informal encounters, everyday connections and local characters in cycle campaigning in Hull

This paper will draw on ethnographic and interview data on cycle campaigners in Hull (2010). It focuses on campaigners in both official and volunteer contexts, taking particular interest in the myriad of places, times and methods in and through which individuals do important work. While some of these practices take place in conventional formal meetings, many others occur in informal settings and at unusual times. Campaigners talk to people in the street. They stop to help strangers with punctures. They volunteer with different cycle groups in their spare time. They introduce people. They share news and tell of events. They make lists, keep records and write letters. These often serendipitous and largely undocumented “natterings” and “silly little things” have important consequences. This paper examines how small encounters and seemingly inconsequential events serve to generate and reinforce critical connections between people, ideas and things. It reflects upon the role of cycle campaigners as “local characters” with deeply embedded knowledge of people, places and things that together make and sustain these networks. Emerson (2009) draws attention to ‘ordinary troubles’ to highlight the routine, boring and often trivialised interactions that help to explain more dramatic events. In this case, a focus on “nattering” and “silly little things” brings to light not only the mundane activities that underpin successful cycling campaigning but also the persistence, patience and relentless pressure necessary to make change happen.